saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Torre Velasca in Milan, Italy
Torre Velasca

1950s · Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Torre Velasca image

Seed wave 60 image for Torre Velasca.

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Torre Velasca

Milan, Lombardy, Italy · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Torre VelascaTorre Velasca

1950s · Milan, Lombardy, Italy

UNStudioUNStudio

Arnhem, Gelderland, The Netherlands

Typeworkbureau
Year / years1950sUnrecorded
PlaceMilan, Lombardy, ItalyArnhem, Gelderland, The Netherlands
Place contextMilan, Lombardy, ItalyRepresentative site: Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands
Climate20°C · 13.8h daylight · 6 km/h wind12°C · 14.2h daylight · 9 km/h wind · via Arnhem Centraal railway station
FocusMixed-use tower9 works in corpus
Architects

No architects linked yet.

  • Ben van Berkel
Linked context

Bureaus

  • BBPR

Notable works

  • Arnhem Centraal railway station
  • Rijksmuseum Twenthe
  • Mercedes-Benz Museum
  • Erasmusbrug
Typologies
  • tower
  • skyscraper
  • mixed-use
  • building
  • museum
  • infrastructure
  • housing
  • tower
  • transportation
  • train station
Materials
  • concrete
  • glass
  • glass
  • steel
  • concrete
Carbon signals

Concrete and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Glass

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible2 of 2 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.