saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Herbert and Katherine Jacobs Second House

Madison, Madison, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap

Herbert and Katherine Jacobs Second House

Hero image

House by Frank Lloyd Wright in Madison, Wisconsin, US

Credit:

Rights: Unknown · unknown

Field
Herbert and Katherine Jacobs Second HouseHerbert and Katherine Jacobs Second House

1948 · Madison, Madison, United States

Togo MuranoTogo Murano

1930 · Osaka, Osaka Prefecture, Japan

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19481930
PlaceMadison, Madison, United StatesOsaka, Osaka Prefecture, Japan
Place contextMadison, Madison, United StatesRepresentative site: Kashihara, Kashihara, Japan
Climate19°C · 13.7h daylight · 22 km/h wind10°C · 13.3h daylight · 7 km/h wind · via Kashiharajingū-mae Station
FocusHouse3 works in corpus
Architects
  • Frank Lloyd Wright
  • Togo Murano
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation

Notable works

  • Kashiharajingū-mae Station
  • Abeno Harukas
  • Nissay Theatre
Typologies
  • house
  • building
  • tower
  • performance venue
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • concrete
  • glass
  • steel
  • plaster
  • timber
Carbon signals

house gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded1 of 1 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.