saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Vilamajo House Museum in Montevideo, Uruguay
Vilamajo House Museum

1930 · Montevideo, Montevideo Department, Uruguay

Vilamajo House Museum image

Seed wave 45 image for the Vilamajo House Museum.

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Vilamajo House Museum

Montevideo, Montevideo Department, Uruguay · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Vilamajo House MuseumVilamajo House Museum

1930 · Montevideo, Montevideo Department, Uruguay

Sverre FehnSverre Fehn

Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Typeworkbureau
Year / years1930Unrecorded
PlaceMontevideo, Montevideo Department, UruguayOslo, Oslo, Norway
Place contextMontevideo, Montevideo Department, UruguayRepresentative site: Venice, Veneto, Italy
Climate19°C · 11.0h daylight · 13 km/h wind15°C · 13.8h daylight · 8 km/h wind · via Nordic Pavilion
FocusHouse museum3 works in corpus
Architects
  • Julio Vilamajo
  • Sverre Fehn
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Julio Vilamajo

Notable works

  • Nordic Pavilion
  • Norwegian Glacier Museum
  • Colosseum kino
Typologies
  • house
  • museum
  • residence
  • pavilion
  • exhibition
  • museum
  • cultural building
  • landscape architecture
  • building
Materials
  • masonry
  • stucco
  • timber
  • concrete
  • glass
  • steel
Carbon signals

Brick and Stucco look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Brick
  • Stucco

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible2 of 2 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.