saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Matchstick Palace in Stockholm, Sweden
Matchstick Palace

1928 · Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

Matchstick Palace image

Building in Stockholm, Sweden

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Matchstick Palace

Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Matchstick PalaceMatchstick Palace

1928 · Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden

Studio LibeskindStudio Libeskind

Dublin, Ireland

Typeworkbureau
Year / years1928Unrecorded
PlaceStockholm, Stockholm, SwedenDublin, Ireland
Place contextStockholm, Stockholm, SwedenRepresentative site: Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Climate16°C · 15.0h daylight · 15 km/h wind12°C · 14.2h daylight · 7 km/h wind · via Bundeswehr Military History Museum
FocusOffice building23 works in corpus
Architects
  • Ivar Tengbom
  • Daniel Libeskind
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Ivar Tengbom

Notable works

  • Bundeswehr Military History Museum
  • Contemporary Jewish Museum
  • Rogers Building (Toronto)
  • Felix Nussbaum Haus
Typologies
  • office
  • museum
  • campus building
  • performance venue
  • house
  • history museum
  • cultural building
  • landscape
  • library
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • zinc
  • concrete
  • glass
  • steel
Carbon signals

office gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded10 of 10 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.