saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

WorksBureausMixedReset selection

Projects

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

Bureaus

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

Visual compare

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

41 Cooper Square in Manhattan, United States

Hero image

41 Cooper Square

2009 · Manhattan, Manhattan, United States

41 Cooper Square image

School building in Manhattan, New York

Map pins

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

41 Cooper Square

Manhattan, Manhattan, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap

Comparison

Field
41 Cooper Square41 Cooper Square

2009 · Manhattan, Manhattan, United States

Robert MaillartRobert Maillart

1901 · Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Typeworkbureau
Year / years20091901
PlaceManhattan, Manhattan, United StatesZurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Place contextManhattan, Manhattan, United StatesRepresentative site: Schiers, Schiers, Switzerland
Climate6°C · 13.6h daylight · 7 km/h wind13°C · 13.9h daylight · 12 km/h wind · via Salginatobel Bridge
FocusEducation building2 works in corpus
Architects
  • Thom Mayne
  • Robert Maillart
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Morphosis

Notable works

  • Salginatobel Bridge
  • Schwandbach Bridge
Typologies
  • gallery
  • education
  • house
  • infrastructure
Materials
  • steel
  • aluminum
  • fabric
  • glass
  • concrete
Carbon signals

Aluminum, Steel, and Fabric look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Aluminum
  • Steel
  • Fabric

Concrete look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
Lower-carbon levers
  • Focus on recycled content, lighter assemblies, and careful facade-specification choices.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
AccessibilityPublicly accessibleAccess not recorded across linked works
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.