saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

WorksBureausMixedReset selection

Projects

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

Bureaus

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

Visual compare

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Map pins

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Asakusa Culture Tourist Information Center

Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap

Comparison

Field
Asakusa Culture Tourist Information CenterAsakusa Culture Tourist Information Center

2012 · Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Otto WagnerOtto Wagner

1880 · Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Typeworkbureau
Year / years20121880
PlaceTokyo, Tokyo, JapanVienna, Vienna, Austria
Place contextTokyo, Tokyo, JapanRepresentative site: Döbling, Döbling, Austria
Climate13°C · 13.3h daylight · 4 km/h wind13°C · 13.9h daylight · 15 km/h wind · via Nussdorf weir and lock
FocusTourist information center21 works in corpus
Architects
  • Kengo Kuma
  • Otto Wagner
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Kengo Kuma & Associates

Notable works

  • Nussdorf weir and lock
  • Pilgramgasse station
  • Kettenbrückengasse station
  • Hotel Bristol, Warsaw
Typologies
  • civic building
  • tourism infrastructure
  • urban infill
  • building
  • housing
  • hospitality
  • church
  • sacred space
  • performance venue
  • house
  • civic building
Materials
  • wood
  • glass
  • steel
  • steel
  • tile
Carbon signals

Steel and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Steel
  • Glass

Steel and Tile look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Steel
  • Tile
Lower-carbon levers
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible7 of 7 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.