saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

WorksBureausMixedReset selection

Projects

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

Bureaus

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

Visual compare

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

31 Building in Seoul, South Korea

Hero image

31 Building

1970 · Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

31 Building image

Seed wave 36 image for 31 Building.

Map pins

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

31 Building

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap

Comparison

Field
31 Building31 Building

1970 · Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Otto WagnerOtto Wagner

1880 · Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19701880
PlaceSeoul, Seoul, South KoreaVienna, Vienna, Austria
Place contextSeoul, Seoul, South KoreaRepresentative site: Döbling, Döbling, Austria
Climate6°C · 13.4h daylight · 2 km/h wind9°C · 14.0h daylight · 10 km/h wind · via Nussdorf weir and lock
FocusOffice building21 works in corpus
Architects
  • Kim Chung-up
  • Otto Wagner
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Kim Chung-up

Notable works

  • Nussdorf weir and lock
  • Pilgramgasse station
  • Kettenbrückengasse station
  • Hotel Bristol, Warsaw
Typologies
  • tower
  • office
  • building
  • housing
  • hospitality
  • church
  • sacred space
  • performance venue
  • house
  • civic building
Materials
  • concrete
  • steel
  • glass
  • steel
  • tile
Carbon signals

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass

Steel and Tile look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Steel
  • Tile
Lower-carbon levers
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded7 of 7 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.