saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Pruitt–Igoe in St. Louis, United States
Pruitt–Igoe

1955 · St. Louis, St. Louis, United States

Pruitt–Igoe image

Demolished housing project in St. Louis, US

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Pruitt–Igoe

St. Louis, St. Louis, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Pruitt–IgoePruitt–Igoe

1955 · St. Louis, St. Louis, United States

OMAOMA

Doha, Qatar

Typeworkbureau
Year / years1955Unrecorded
PlaceSt. Louis, St. Louis, United StatesDoha, Qatar
Place contextSt. Louis, St. Louis, United StatesRepresentative site: Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Climate7°C · 13.4h daylight · 5 km/h wind10°C · 14.2h daylight · 11 km/h wind · via Kunsthal
FocusHousing20 works in corpus
Architects
  • Minoru Yamasaki
  • Rem Koolhaas
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Yamasaki & Associates

Notable works

  • Kunsthal
  • Zénith de Lille
  • De Rotterdam
  • Guggenheim Hermitage Museum
Typologies
  • housing
  • building
  • tower
  • hospitality
  • office
  • museum
  • performance venue
  • library
  • cultural
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • glass
  • steel
  • concrete
  • stone
Carbon signals

housing gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Check source geography, fabrication intensity, and whether stone is structural, cladding, or finish-only.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded9 of 9 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.