saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Wingspread in Wind Point, United States
Wingspread

1936 · Wind Point, Wind Point, United States

Wingspread image

Historic house in Wind Point, Wisconsin

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Wingspread

Wind Point, Wind Point, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
WingspreadWingspread

1936 · Wind Point, Wind Point, United States

MVRDVMVRDV

Seoul, South Korea

Typeworkbureau
Year / years1936Unrecorded
PlaceWind Point, Wind Point, United StatesSeoul, South Korea
Place contextWind Point, Wind Point, United StatesRepresentative site: Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Climate5°C · 13.6h daylight · 21 km/h wind11°C · 14.3h daylight · 21 km/h wind · via Silodam
FocusHouse9 works in corpus
Architects
  • Frank Lloyd Wright
  • Winy Maas
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation

Notable works

  • Silodam
  • Effenaar
  • Market Hall (Rotterdam)
  • Westerdok Apartments
Typologies
  • house
  • performance venue
  • housing
  • building
  • house
  • office
  • landscape
  • residential
  • apartments
  • dabas
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • glass
  • concrete
  • other
  • brick
Carbon signals

house and performance venue gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Brick, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Brick
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible3 of 3 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.