saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

One Port Center in Princeton, United States
One Port Center

1996 · Princeton, New Jersey, United States

One Port Center image

Skyscraper in Camden

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

One Port Center

Princeton, New Jersey, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
One Port CenterOne Port Center

1996 · Princeton, New Jersey, United States

MVRDVMVRDV

Seoul, South Korea

Typeworkbureau
Year / years1996Unrecorded
PlacePrinceton, New Jersey, United StatesSeoul, South Korea
Place contextPrinceton, New Jersey, United StatesRepresentative site: Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Climate3°C · 13.5h daylight · 4 km/h wind9°C · 14.3h daylight · 10 km/h wind · via Silodam
FocusOffice building9 works in corpus
Architects
  • Michael Graves
  • Winy Maas
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Michael Graves Architecture & Design

Notable works

  • Silodam
  • Effenaar
  • Market Hall (Rotterdam)
  • Westerdok Apartments
Typologies
  • office
  • housing
  • building
  • house
  • office
  • landscape
  • residential
  • apartments
  • dabas
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • glass
  • concrete
  • other
  • brick
Carbon signals

office gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Brick, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Brick
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded3 of 3 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.