saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

31 Building in Seoul, South Korea
31 Building

1970 · Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

31 Building image

Seed wave 36 image for 31 Building.

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

31 Building

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
31 Building31 Building

1970 · Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Michael Graves Architecture & DesignMichael Graves Architecture & Design

1964 · Princeton, New Jersey, United States

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19701964
PlaceSeoul, Seoul, South KoreaPrinceton, New Jersey, United States
Place contextSeoul, Seoul, South KoreaRepresentative site: Minneapolis, Minneapolis, United States
ClimateClimate unavailableClimate unavailable · via Minneapolis Institute of Art
FocusOffice building15 works in corpus
Architects
  • Kim Chung-up
  • Michael Graves
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Kim Chung-up

Notable works

  • Minneapolis Institute of Art
  • Detroit Institute of Arts
  • Michael C. Carlos Museum
  • Louwman Museum
Typologies
  • tower
  • office
  • museum
  • library
  • education
  • campus building
  • house
  • office
  • performance venue
  • hospitality
Materials
  • concrete
  • steel
  • glass
  • timber
  • stone
Carbon signals

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass

Stone look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Stone
Lower-carbon levers
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Check source geography, fabrication intensity, and whether stone is structural, cladding, or finish-only.
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded9 of 9 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.