saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Stora Enso headquarters in Helsinki, Finland
Stora Enso headquarters

1961 · Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Stora Enso headquarters image

Office building in Helsinki, Finland, designed by Alvar Aalto

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Stora Enso headquarters

Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap

Stora Enso headquarters

Hero image

Office building in Helsinki, Finland, designed by Alvar Aalto

Credit:

Rights: Unknown · unknown

Field
Stora Enso headquartersStora Enso headquarters

1961 · Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Kim Chung-upKim Chung-up

1956-1988 · Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19611956-1988
PlaceHelsinki, Helsinki, FinlandSeoul, Seoul, South Korea
Place contextHelsinki, Helsinki, FinlandRepresentative site: Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Climate10°C · 15.1h daylight · 15 km/h wind5°C · 13.4h daylight · 2 km/h wind · via 31 Building
FocusOffice building1 works in corpus
Architects
  • Alvar Aalto
  • Kim Chung-up
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Alvar Aalto Studio

Notable works

  • 31 Building
Typologies
  • office
  • tower
  • office
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • concrete
  • steel
  • glass
Carbon signals

office gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
AccessibilityAccess not recordedAccess not recorded across linked works
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.