saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Walt Disney World Dolphin in Florida, United States
Walt Disney World Dolphin

1990 · Florida, Florida, United States

Walt Disney World Dolphin image

Hotel at Walt Disney World

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Walt Disney World Dolphin

Florida, Florida, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Walt Disney World DolphinWalt Disney World Dolphin

1990 · Florida, Florida, United States

Jan Inge HovigJan Inge Hovig

1950-1977 · Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19901950-1977
PlaceFlorida, Florida, United StatesOslo, Oslo, Norway
Place contextFlorida, Florida, United StatesRepresentative site: Narvik Municipality, Narvik Municipality, Norway
Climate15°C · 13.0h daylight · 12 km/h wind7°C · 16.7h daylight · 22 km/h wind · via Fredskapellet
FocusPerformance venue3 works in corpus
Architects
  • Michael Graves
  • Jan Inge Hovig
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Michael Graves Architecture & Design

Notable works

  • Fredskapellet
  • Harstad Church
  • Arctic Cathedral
Typologies
  • performance venue
  • hospitality
  • church
  • sacred space
  • chapel
  • religious building
  • civic landmark
Materials
  • timber
  • brick
  • concrete
  • metal
  • glass
Carbon signals

The recorded material palette leans lower-carbon on paper, but procurement and quantity still matter.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Brick, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Brick
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible3 of 3 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.