saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Alan I W Frank House in Pittsburgh, United States
Alan I W Frank House

1940 · Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States

Alan I W Frank House image

House in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Alan I W Frank House

Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Alan I W Frank HouseAlan I W Frank House

1940 · Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States

Jan Inge HovigJan Inge Hovig

1950-1977 · Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19401950-1977
PlacePittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United StatesOslo, Oslo, Norway
Place contextPittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United StatesRepresentative site: Narvik Municipality, Narvik Municipality, Norway
Climate7°C · 13.5h daylight · 17 km/h wind8°C · 16.6h daylight · 8 km/h wind · via Fredskapellet
FocusHousing3 works in corpus
Architects
  • Marcel Breuer
  • Jan Inge Hovig
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Marcel Breuer Associates

Notable works

  • Fredskapellet
  • Harstad Church
  • Arctic Cathedral
Typologies
  • housing
  • house
  • church
  • sacred space
  • chapel
  • religious building
  • civic landmark
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • brick
  • concrete
  • metal
  • glass
Carbon signals

housing and house gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Brick, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Brick
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded3 of 3 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.