saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Accenture Tower (Chicago) in Chicago, United States
Accenture Tower (Chicago)

1987 · Chicago, Chicago, United States

Accenture Tower (Chicago) image

Office skyscraper in Chicago, Illinois

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Accenture Tower (Chicago)

Chicago, Chicago, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Accenture Tower (Chicago)Accenture Tower (Chicago)

1987 · Chicago, Chicago, United States

Jan Inge HovigJan Inge Hovig

1950-1977 · Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19871950-1977
PlaceChicago, Chicago, United StatesOslo, Oslo, Norway
Place contextChicago, Chicago, United StatesRepresentative site: Narvik Municipality, Narvik Municipality, Norway
Climate17°C · 13.6h daylight · 7 km/h wind6°C · 16.8h daylight · 23 km/h wind · via Fredskapellet
FocusHouse3 works in corpus
Architects
  • Helmut Jahn
  • Jan Inge Hovig
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Murphy/Jahn

Notable works

  • Fredskapellet
  • Harstad Church
  • Arctic Cathedral
Typologies
  • house
  • tower
  • office
  • church
  • sacred space
  • chapel
  • religious building
  • civic landmark
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • brick
  • concrete
  • metal
  • glass
Carbon signals

house, tower, and office gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Brick, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Brick
  • Glass
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded3 of 3 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.