saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

31 Building in Seoul, South Korea
31 Building

1970 · Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

31 Building image

Seed wave 36 image for 31 Building.

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

31 Building

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
31 Building31 Building

1970 · Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Hiroshi Naito Architect & AssociatesHiroshi Naito Architect & Associates

1981 · Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19701981
PlaceSeoul, Seoul, South KoreaTokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Place contextSeoul, Seoul, South KoreaRepresentative site: Asahikawa, Asahikawa, Japan
Climate11°C · 13.4h daylight · 9 km/h wind11°C · 13.7h daylight · 9 km/h wind · via Asahikawa Station
FocusOffice building7 works in corpus
Architects
  • Kim Chung-up
  • Hiroshi Naito
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Kim Chung-up

Notable works

  • Asahikawa Station
  • Takayama Station
  • Makino Botanical Garden
  • Tenshin Memorial Museum of Art, Ibaraki
Typologies
  • tower
  • office
  • performance venue
  • landscape
  • museum
  • memorial
Materials
  • concrete
  • steel
  • glass
  • timber
Carbon signals

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass

The recorded material palette leans lower-carbon on paper, but procurement and quantity still matter.

No dominant drivers yet.

Lower-carbon levers
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded7 of 7 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.