saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

41 Cooper Square in Manhattan, United States
41 Cooper Square

2009 · Manhattan, Manhattan, United States

41 Cooper Square image

School building in Manhattan, New York

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

41 Cooper Square

Manhattan, Manhattan, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
41 Cooper Square41 Cooper Square

2009 · Manhattan, Manhattan, United States

Gustav PeichlGustav Peichl

1960 · Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Typeworkbureau
Year / years20091960
PlaceManhattan, Manhattan, United StatesVienna, Vienna, Austria
Place contextManhattan, Manhattan, United StatesRepresentative site: Stadtbezirk Bonn, Stadtbezirk Bonn, Germany
Climate3°C · 13.5h daylight · 6 km/h wind13°C · 14.1h daylight · 12 km/h wind · via Kunst- und Ausstellungshalle der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
FocusEducation building5 works in corpus
Architects
  • Thom Mayne
  • Gustav Peichl
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Morphosis

Notable works

  • Kunst- und Ausstellungshalle der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
  • Millennium Tower (Vienna)
  • Donau City
  • Kahlenberg Transmitter
Typologies
  • gallery
  • education
  • house
  • museum
  • tower
  • building
Materials
  • steel
  • aluminum
  • fabric
  • glass
  • steel
Carbon signals

Aluminum, Steel, and Fabric look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Aluminum
  • Steel
  • Fabric

Steel look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Steel
Lower-carbon levers
  • Focus on recycled content, lighter assemblies, and careful facade-specification choices.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible1 of 1 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.