saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

LUMA Tower in Arles, France
LUMA Tower

2021 · Arles, Arles, France

LUMA Tower image

Tower in Arles, France

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

LUMA Tower

Arles, Arles, France · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
LUMA TowerLUMA Tower

2021 · Arles, Arles, France

Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationFrank Lloyd Wright Foundation

1940 · Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Typeworkbureau
Year / years20211940
PlaceArles, Arles, FranceScottsdale, Arizona, United States
Place contextArles, Arles, FranceRepresentative site: Wyoming, Wyoming, United States
Climate23°C · 13.7h daylight · 17 km/h wind11°C · 13.7h daylight · 16 km/h wind · via Unity Chapel
FocusArchitecture121 works in corpus
Architects
  • Frank Gehry
  • Frank Lloyd Wright
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Gehry Partners

Notable works

  • Unity Chapel
  • Rookery Building
  • Louis Sullivan Bungalow
  • Walter Gale House
Typologies
  • tower
  • chapel
  • sacred space
  • office
  • civic building
  • building
  • house
  • landscape
  • education
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • steel
  • timber
  • plaster
  • brick
  • stone
  • concrete
  • glass
  • copper
Carbon signals

tower gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Steel, and Brick look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Brick
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded40 of 40 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.