saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

LUMA Arles in Arles, France
LUMA Arles

2013 · Arles, Arles, France

LUMA Arles image

Arts centre in Arles, France

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

LUMA Arles

Arles, Arles, France · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
LUMA ArlesLUMA Arles

2013 · Arles, Arles, France

Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationFrank Lloyd Wright Foundation

1940 · Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Typeworkbureau
Year / years20131940
PlaceArles, Arles, FranceScottsdale, Arizona, United States
Place contextArles, Arles, FranceRepresentative site: Wyoming, Wyoming, United States
Climate13°C · 13.6h daylight · 3 km/h wind6°C · 13.6h daylight · 22 km/h wind · via Unity Chapel
FocusArchitecture121 works in corpus
Architects
  • Frank Gehry
  • Frank Lloyd Wright
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Gehry Partners

Notable works

  • Unity Chapel
  • Rookery Building
  • Louis Sullivan Bungalow
  • Walter Gale House
Typologies
  • tower
  • chapel
  • sacred space
  • office
  • civic building
  • building
  • house
  • landscape
  • education
Materials
  • steel
  • steel
  • timber
  • plaster
  • brick
  • stone
  • concrete
  • glass
  • copper
Carbon signals

Steel look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Steel

Concrete, Steel, and Brick look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Brick
Lower-carbon levers
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
AccessibilityAccess not recorded40 of 40 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.