saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Sheldon & Tracy Levy Student Learning Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap

Sheldon & Tracy Levy Student Learning Centre

Hero image

Seed wave 34 image for Sheldon & Tracy Levy Student Learning Centre.

Credit:

Rights: Unknown · unknown

Field
Sheldon & Tracy Levy Student Learning CentreSheldon & Tracy Levy Student Learning Centre

2015 · Toronto, Ontario, Canada

ElementalElemental

2001 · Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile

Typeworkbureau
Year / years20152001
PlaceToronto, Ontario, CanadaSantiago, Santiago Metropolitan Region, Chile
Place contextToronto, Ontario, CanadaRepresentative site: Iquique, Tarapaca Region, Chile
Climate10°C · 13.6h daylight · 1 km/h wind21°C · 11.6h daylight · 2 km/h wind · via Quinta Monroy
FocusStudent learning center1 works in corpus
Architects
  • Kjetil Trædal Thorsen
  • Alejandro Aravena
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Snøhetta

Notable works

  • Quinta Monroy
Typologies
  • education
  • student center
  • campus building
  • library
  • housing
  • social housing
  • residential
Materials
  • glass
  • steel
  • concrete
  • concrete
  • masonry
Carbon signals

Concrete, Steel, and Glass look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Glass

Concrete and Brick look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Brick
Lower-carbon levers
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
AccessibilityPublicly accessibleAccess not recorded across linked works
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.