saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Gateway Arch in St. Louis, United States
Gateway Arch

1968 · St. Louis, St. Louis, United States

Gateway Arch image

US National Historic Landmark in St. Louis, Missouri

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Gateway Arch

St. Louis, St. Louis, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
Gateway ArchGateway Arch

1968 · St. Louis, St. Louis, United States

Edwin LutyensEdwin Lutyens

1888 · London, England, United Kingdom

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19681888
PlaceSt. Louis, St. Louis, United StatesLondon, England, United Kingdom
Place contextSt. Louis, St. Louis, United StatesRepresentative site: Holy Island, Holy Island, United Kingdom
Climate10°C · 13.4h daylight · 8 km/h wind9°C · 14.6h daylight · 17 km/h wind · via Lindisfarne Castle
FocusLandscape project102 works in corpus
Architects
  • Eero Saarinen
  • Edwin Lutyens
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Eero Saarinen and Associates

Notable works

  • Lindisfarne Castle
  • Renishaw Hall
  • Deanery Garden
  • Overstrand Hall
Typologies
  • landscape
  • building
  • house
  • landscape
  • civic building
  • infrastructure
  • hospitality
  • church
  • sacred space
Materials
  • steel
  • timber
  • stone
  • brick
  • glass
Carbon signals

Steel look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Steel

Brick, Glass, and Stone look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Brick
  • Glass
  • Stone
Lower-carbon levers
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Compare system-level facade options, reduce overspecification, and pair glass choices with structural reductions.
  • Check source geography, fabrication intensity, and whether stone is structural, cladding, or finish-only.
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible30 of 30 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.

No linked books yet.