saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

Wingspread in Wind Point, United States
Wingspread

1936 · Wind Point, Wind Point, United States

Wingspread image

Historic house in Wind Point, Wisconsin

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

Wingspread

Wind Point, Wind Point, United States · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
WingspreadWingspread

1936 · Wind Point, Wind Point, United States

Atelier Peter Zumthor

1979 · Haldenstein, Graubunden, Switzerland

Typeworkbureau
Year / years19361979
PlaceWind Point, Wind Point, United StatesHaldenstein, Graubunden, Switzerland
Place contextWind Point, Wind Point, United StatesRepresentative site: Vals, Graubunden, Switzerland
Climate1°C · 13.6h daylight · 10 km/h wind12°C · 13.9h daylight · 9 km/h wind · via Therme Vals
FocusHouse2 works in corpus
Architects
  • Frank Lloyd Wright
  • Peter Zumthor
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation

Notable works

  • Therme Vals
  • Bruder Klaus Field Chapel
Typologies
  • house
  • performance venue
  • bathhouse
  • hospitality
  • landscape
  • chapel
  • religious building
Materials

Not recorded yet.

  • quartzite
  • concrete
  • water
  • rammed concrete
  • timber
Carbon signals

house and performance venue gives us a typology starting point even though the work does not have a recorded material palette yet.

No dominant drivers yet.

Concrete, Concrete, and Quartzite look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Concrete
  • Quartzite
Lower-carbon levers

No levers surfaced yet.

  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible2 of 2 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.