saved.archi

your architecture companion

Compare

Compare works, bureaus, or a mixed set

Read a small selection side by side through images, place context, climate, typology, materials, carbon signals, accessibility, and related books.

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

1 selected · 1 other item held elsewhere in the compare set

The selected works stay in sync by slot, while the pins map where they sit inside the mixed set.

View across the elevated concrete bridges and tower volumes at SESC Pompeia in Sao Paulo.
SESC Pompeia

1977-1986 · Sao Paulo, Brazil

SESC Pompeia courtyard view

Tower and bridge view across the SESC Pompeia complex.

Site spread

Pins are normalized from the recorded work coordinates so you can read the set spatially.

SESC Pompeia

Sao Paulo, Brazil · Exact work coordinates

OpenStreetMap
Field
SESC PompeiaSESC Pompeia

1977-1986 · Sao Paulo, Brazil

Adolf LoosAdolf Loos

1896 · Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Typeworkbureau
Year / years1977-19861896
PlaceSao Paulo, BrazilVienna, Vienna, Austria
Place contextSao Paulo, BrazilRepresentative site: Innere Stadt, Innere Stadt, Austria
Climate20°C · 11.4h daylight · 10 km/h wind9°C · 14.0h daylight · 7 km/h wind · via Café Museum
FocusCultural and sports center5 works in corpus
Architects
  • Lina Bo Bardi
  • Adolf Loos
Linked context

Bureaus

  • Studio Lina Bo Bardi

Notable works

  • Café Museum
  • Looshaus
  • Rufer House
  • Villa Muller
Typologies
  • adaptive reuse
  • cultural center
  • sports and leisure
  • museum
  • housing
  • house
  • villa
  • modernism
Materials
  • concrete
  • brick
  • steel
  • stucco
  • concrete
  • timber
Carbon signals

Concrete, Steel, and Brick look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Steel
  • Brick

Concrete and Stucco look like the main embodied-carbon drivers in the current palette.

  • Concrete
  • Stucco
Lower-carbon levers
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Prioritize recycled content, efficient sections, and procurement-specific EPD comparisons.
  • Review masonry extent, reuse opportunities, and alternate assemblies where the design language allows it.
  • Look for lower-clinker mixes, reused structure, and scope reductions before fine-grained product swaps.
  • Use classification and product-level EPD research to place this material more precisely.
  • Track sourcing, certification, and assembly logic rather than assuming timber is automatically low impact.
AccessibilityPublicly accessible2 of 2 recorded works are publicly accessible
Related books

No linked books yet.